MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Sam Bakker [] vs Mikail Alimli [] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

H2H: Bakker 1 - 0 Alimli

They have played 2 sets in total, with Bakker winning 2 and Alimli winning 0. The last match between Bakker and Alimli was at the M15 Monastir, 23-02-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Sam Bakker getting the victory 6-4 7-6(2).

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Sam Bakker 1
Mikail Alimli 0
Bakker vs Alimli H2H Profile
Bakker Stats Alimli
20% (1-4) YTD Win/Loss 47% (8-9)
1 Head-to-Head 0
N/A Ranking N/A
Highest Rank N/A
25 Age 21
- Plays -
0 Titles 0
25% (9-27) Career Total W/L 48% (86-93)
$0 Career Prize Money $0
1 Hard H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Bakker VS Alimli H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-4 7-6(2)

Bakker VS Alimli H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Bakker Vs Alimli H2H Stats
Sam Bakker Bakker Stats Mikail Alimli Alimli
1 H2H Matches 0
2 Sets Won 0
13 Games Won 10
0 Aces (Total) 0
0 Total Double Faults 0
0:0:0 Average Match Time 0:0:0
0% (0/0) 1st Serve % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Serve Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 2nd Serve Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Break Points Won % (Total) 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Return Points Win % 0% (0/0)
100% (1/1) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
100% (1/1) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 0% (0/1)
0% (0/0) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/0)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (0/0)
0% (1/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Sam Bakker vs Mikail Alimli Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Bakker 1 - 0 Alimli

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bakker has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Alimli has won 46.58%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bakker, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Alimli has won 44.19%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 24.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Bakker has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Alimli has saved 53.1% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Bakker has won 27.27% of matches played (W/L 3/ 8), with Alimli winning 55.74% (W/L 34/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Bakker has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 32% (W/L 8/ 17), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 9% (W/L 1/ 10). Alimli has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 32/ 30), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 34/ 43).
  • Player level: In the last year, Bakker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 27.27% of matches (W/L 3/ 8), where as Alimli has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.67% of matches (W/L 34/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bakker winning 1 times and Alimli being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bakker winning 2 and Alimli winning 0. The last match between Bakker and Alimli was at the M15 Monastir, 23-02-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Sam Bakker getting the victory 6-4 7-6(2).
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Bakker and Alimli have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bakker winning 0 times and Alimli 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Bakker winning 1, and Alimli 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bakker has played against opponents with an average rank of 131.82 while Alimli has played against players with an average rank of 217.72.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bakker has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Alimli has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Bakker has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Alimli has converted 32.76% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Sam Bakker Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    Q1
    L
    4-6 6-2 10-3 H2H
    Q1
    L
    6-1 6-1 H2H
    Q2
    L
    6-3 6-1 H2H
    Q1
    W
    6-4 7-6(2) H2H
    Q1
    L
    6-2 6-0 H2H
    Q1
    L
    6-4 6-3 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Yorrick Veldkamp
    Player
    Sam Bakker
    50% ( 34 of 68)
    1st Serve %
    72% ( 44 of 61)
    3
    Aces
    0
    6
    Double Faults
    3
    79% ( 27 of 34)
    1st Serve Won
    64% ( 28 of 44)
    50% ( 17 of 34)
    2nd Serve Won
    53% ( 9 of 17)
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    35% ( 24 of 68)
    Rtn Points Won
    39% ( 24 of 61)
    68
    Total Points Won
    61
    L
    7-5 6-3 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Stian Klaassen
    Player
    Sam Bakker
    53% ( 26 of 49)
    1st Serve %
    61% ( 37 of 61)
    5
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    81% ( 21 of 26)
    1st Serve Won
    62% ( 23 of 37)
    61% ( 14 of 23)
    2nd Serve Won
    46% ( 11 of 24)
    44% ( 4 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    29% ( 14 of 49)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 27 of 61)
    62
    Total Points Won
    48
    L
    6-2 6-4 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Sam Bakker
    Player
    Nyo Van Dyck
    69% ( 40 of 58)
    1st Serve %
    70% ( 38 of 54)
    -
    Aces
    -
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    73% ( 29 of 40)
    1st Serve Won
    66% ( 25 of 38)
    67% ( 12 of 18)
    2nd Serve Won
    56% ( 9 of 16)
    20% ( 2 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    29% ( 17 of 58)
    Rtn Points Won
    37% ( 20 of 54)
    61
    Total Points Won
    51
    W
    6-3 6-4 H2H
    Q2
    L
    6-1 6-2 H2H

    Mikail Alimli Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Mikail Alimli
    Player
    Pierre Antoine Tailleu
    50% ( 28 of 56)
    1st Serve %
    52% ( 27 of 52)
    0
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    4
    75% ( 21 of 28)
    1st Serve Won
    85% ( 23 of 27)
    50% ( 14 of 28)
    2nd Serve Won
    44% ( 11 of 25)
    50% ( 1 of 2)
    Break Points Won
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    38% ( 21 of 56)
    Rtn Points Won
    35% ( 18 of 52)
    53
    Total Points Won
    55
    W
    0-6 6-3 10-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Mathias Bourgue
    Player
    Mikail Alimli
    65% ( 42 of 65)
    1st Serve %
    57% ( 40 of 70)
    13
    Aces
    8
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    79% ( 33 of 42)
    1st Serve Won
    68% ( 27 of 40)
    61% ( 14 of 23)
    2nd Serve Won
    50% ( 15 of 30)
    33% ( 2 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    28% ( 18 of 65)
    Rtn Points Won
    40% ( 28 of 70)
    75
    Total Points Won
    60
    L
    6-3 7-6(4) H2H
    QF
    cross
    Mikail Alimli
    Player
    Sacha Grandvincent
    43% ( 18 of 42)
    1st Serve %
    53% ( 26 of 49)
    8
    Aces
    4
    0
    Double Faults
    3
    89% ( 16 of 18)
    1st Serve Won
    54% ( 14 of 26)
    63% ( 15 of 24)
    2nd Serve Won
    26% ( 6 of 23)
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    26% ( 11 of 42)
    Rtn Points Won
    59% ( 29 of 49)
    60
    Total Points Won
    31
    W
    6-2 6-0 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Mikail Alimli
    Player
    Octave Caillat
    64% ( 25 of 39)
    1st Serve %
    78% ( 46 of 59)
    4
    Aces
    2
    0
    Double Faults
    2
    80% ( 20 of 25)
    1st Serve Won
    54% ( 25 of 46)
    57% ( 8 of 14)
    2nd Serve Won
    23% ( 3 of 13)
    42% ( 5 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    28% ( 11 of 39)
    Rtn Points Won
    53% ( 31 of 59)
    59
    Total Points Won
    39
    W
    6-2 6-1 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Harry Wendelken
    Player
    Mikail Alimli
    55% ( 32 of 58)
    1st Serve %
    51% ( 30 of 59)
    4
    Aces
    3
    3
    Double Faults
    2
    63% ( 20 of 32)
    1st Serve Won
    73% ( 22 of 30)
    46% ( 12 of 26)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 14 of 29)
    38% ( 3 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    67% ( 4 of 6)
    45% ( 26 of 58)
    Rtn Points Won
    39% ( 23 of 59)
    55
    Total Points Won
    62
    L
    6-3 2-6 14-12 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Mikail Alimli
    Player
    Theo Cabre
    53% ( 19 of 36)
    1st Serve %
    48% ( 20 of 42)
    3
    Aces
    2
    1
    Double Faults
    5
    79% ( 15 of 19)
    1st Serve Won
    55% ( 11 of 20)
    71% ( 12 of 17)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 10 of 22)
    44% ( 4 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    25% ( 9 of 36)
    Rtn Points Won
    50% ( 21 of 42)
    48
    Total Points Won
    30
    W
    6-1 6-3 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Louis Larue
    Player
    Mikail Alimli
    57% ( 51 of 89)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 56 of 85)
    2
    Aces
    7
    6
    Double Faults
    1
    71% ( 36 of 51)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 35 of 56)
    55% ( 21 of 38)
    2nd Serve Won
    55% ( 16 of 29)
    30% ( 3 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    40% ( 2 of 5)
    36% ( 32 of 89)
    Rtn Points Won
    40% ( 34 of 85)
    91
    Total Points Won
    83
    L
    6-7(5) 6-3 10-4 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Mikail Alimli
    Player
    Alexandre Gallet-Christensen
    62% ( 23 of 37)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 47 of 72)
    1
    Aces
    2
    0
    Double Faults
    4
    78% ( 18 of 23)
    1st Serve Won
    49% ( 23 of 47)
    71% ( 10 of 14)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 12 of 25)
    45% ( 5 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    24% ( 9 of 37)
    Rtn Points Won
    51% ( 37 of 72)
    65
    Total Points Won
    44
    W
    6-2 6-1 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Markus Molder
    Player
    Mikail Alimli
    56% ( 54 of 97)
    1st Serve %
    58% ( 38 of 65)
    4
    Aces
    6
    1
    Double Faults
    3
    76% ( 41 of 54)
    1st Serve Won
    79% ( 30 of 38)
    56% ( 24 of 43)
    2nd Serve Won
    56% ( 15 of 27)
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 6)
    33% ( 32 of 97)
    Rtn Points Won
    31% ( 20 of 65)
    85
    Total Points Won
    77
    L
    6-3 7-6(6) H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Mikail Alimli
    Player
    Leo Vuillaume
    62% ( 32 of 52)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 37 of 57)
    9
    Aces
    4
    1
    Double Faults
    3
    84% ( 27 of 32)
    1st Serve Won
    57% ( 21 of 37)
    55% ( 11 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    35% ( 7 of 20)
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 4)
    27% ( 14 of 52)
    Rtn Points Won
    51% ( 29 of 57)
    67
    Total Points Won
    42
    W
    6-1 6-2 H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Bakker & Alimli Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Sam Bakker Bakker Stats Mikail Alimli Alimli
    25% (9/27) Win/Loss 48% (86/93)
    29% (24/58) Sets Win/Loss 48% (191/208)
    41% (320/467) Games Win/Loss 49% (1875/1926)
    0.01 Aces Per Game 0.21
    3 Aces Total 388
    0.04 Double Faults Per Game 0.16
    17 Total Double Faults 301
    1st Match Average Match Time 1st Match
    111.56 Average Opponent Rank 243.56
    60% (230/386) 1st Serve % 54% (3833/7035)
    58% (134/230) 1st Serve Win % 67% (2586/3833)
    41% (64/156) 2nd Serve Win % 48% (1538/3201)
    28% (7/25) Break Points Won % (Total) 42% (274/651)
    32% (111/349) Return Points Win % 39% (2656/6868)
    25% (9/36) Best of 3 Sets Win % 47% (83/175)
    0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
    50% (1/2) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 48% (19/40)
    40% (4/10) Deciding Set Win % 51% (23/45)
    73% (11/8) 1st Set Won, Won Match 84% (82/69)
    27% (11/3) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 16% (82/13)
    4% (25/1) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 18% (97/17)

    Other Predictions

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...